Skip to content
UseQR

UseQR vs QRFY

A genuinely capable dynamic-QR product with hosted microsites — sold through a 7-day trial that deactivates your printed codes when it ends.

Prices and claims verified 2026-08-21 from qrfy.com. Vendors change pricing — check theirs before deciding.

What “free” means at QRFY

There is no free tier. After the 7-day trial, dynamic codes stop redirecting and are held pending a subscription, and billing is quarterly or longer — so the practical entry price is roughly $117 per quarter.

Ten dynamic codes cost about $468/year there. On UseQR: $0, with no account and no scan cap.

Side by side

Feature comparison between QRFY and UseQR
CapabilityQRFYUseQR
Price to keep a printed code alive≈ $117 / quarter$0, forever
Free tierNone — 7-day trialThe whole product
SignupRequiredNone, anywhere
Keyless APINo — account and key requiredYes, no key, no quota
MCP server for AI agentsNoYes — keyless, styled, and it verifies
Scan-verified exportsNoEvery download is decoded before it saves
Open source / self-hostNoMIT, one command
Hosted content pagesExtensive (PDF, gallery, menu, audio)Planned — S18, on the same trust rails
Docs an agent can readJavaScript-only SPAMarkdown, llms.txt, OpenAPI

Patterns to know about before you print

The full catalog, with receipts →

What QRFY does better

What your codes would cost elsewhere

Dynamic, editable codes kept alive for a year.

Cheapest published plan that covers this many codes, annualized. Prices verified 2026-08-21 — vendors change them; the linked pricing pages are the source of truth.

Questions

Is UseQR really free compared to QRFY?
Yes. Every UseQR feature is free forever with no account: static codes, bulk generation, every export format, the API, and the MCP server. There is no free tier. After the 7-day trial, dynamic codes stop redirecting and are held pending a subscription, and billing is quarterly or longer — so the practical entry price is roughly $117 per quarter.
Can I move my QRFY codes to UseQR?
Static codes need nothing — they encode your data directly, so they keep working. Dynamic codes point at that vendor's short domain, so they have to be re-created and re-printed; UseQR's migration importer and /autopsy tools land with the dynamic release.
What does QRFY do better?
26 content types where every dynamic type is a full hosted microsite — multi-PDF, image gallery, audio, ISO-keyed multi-language menus. UseQR's equivalents are planned, not shipped. 19 module styles, 33 corner styles, and 31 frames, plus per-QR GA4 / Meta Pixel / GTM fields. The market's cleanest bulk API shape: one POST with a shared style plus per-item overrides.

Sources

QRFY is a trademark of its owner. This page is an independent comparison, not an affiliation. Something out of date? Open an issue and we’ll correct it.